使用深度研究的ChatGPT论文写作
OpenAI ChatGPT 4o深度研究版
您是一名正在撰写博士论文的优秀研究生。由于最终论文将包含多个章节，总计约70,000词，您需要将其分解为若干子任务。
当前是子任务9，专注于第8章的写作。
随附十份文档：
- 论文研究基础：《多重危机下的人类生存》——本文档提供整篇论文的概览，应作为论文路线图，帮助理解当前子任务的定位
- 论文纲要与贡献——论文章节大纲，用于确定当前章节在整体叙事中的位置
- 起始参考文献——基础文献清单，但需通过自主深度迭代研究大幅拓展参考资料
4-10. 第1-7章初稿——论文前七章内容
这些文档将帮助确保第8章与论文的整体叙事和方向保持一致。
请遵循以下具体任务说明及论文研究问题提示：
• 主要引用学术文献资源
• 采用滚雪球式文献研究法，追踪文献线索直至达到理论饱和
• 展现深厚的学术素养，通过创造性思维从研究中提炼具有变革潜力的新知识
• 以哲学思想为基础同时超越学科界限，实现知识创新
====================
子任务9
===================
第8章：结论——知识贡献与未来方向
本章需通过研究撰写约10,000词的结论章节，要求：
- 总结核心发现与理论贡献
- 回应研究问题：确认证据表明我们正进入质变式新型多重危机（附历史经验警示）；论证复杂性-韧性视角对危机互动的新解读
- 突出原创见解：如识别未被充分认识的反馈循环，融合哲学与科学视角的生存观综合
- 反思研究局限性（不确定性/未覆盖领域）并提出未来研究方向
- 以建设性立场收尾：阐明研究如何为政策制定、公共讨论和学术发展提供指引
（核心主题：跨学科见解整合、希望与警示的平衡、变革行动倡议）
最终需交付：
- 第8章完整草案
====================
论文指导性问题
===================
核心问题：
人类能否在环境压力、社会政治动荡与技术加速构成的多重危机中存续？
子问题：
- 是否存在证据表明人类正进入史无前例的多重危机时期？新危机的维度特征、个体与协同效应、历史异同点及经验教训为何？
- 本研究框架下如何理解人类生存？关于生存与繁荣的新兴概念如何受历史启示？边缘性思维相较于主流思想的独特价值？
- 全球尺度下应对多重危机的思路体系为何？可能影响决策的哲学、社会、政治与经济框架因素？
研究要求：
• 立足学术与哲学思想
• 运用跨历史维度的多源资料
• 生成创新性理论认知
====================
深度研究确认事项
===================
在研究启动前需确认：
- 范围聚焦：结论章应侧重理论总结还是兼顾政策实践？
- 主题侧重：是否需要特别强调某些前章的新见解？
- 未来方向：应作宽泛讨论还是具体建议？
- 行文基调：倾向建设性展望还是审慎反思？
用户指引：
- 需包含政策与实践启示的专门章节
- 依靠学术判断提炼前章核心主题，注重原创知识产出
- 基于研究深度提出具体建议
- 保持中立立场：证据支持处审慎，合理依据处展望
最终提醒：
作为博士论文，必须推动认知边界的突破性知识产出。
*******************************************************
ChatGPT Dissertation Writing using Deep Research
OpenAI ChatGPT 4o with Deep Research
You are a brilliant PhD student writing your PhD. As the final dissertation will consist of several chapters and will be around 70,000 words long you are breaking this down into a number of sub tasks.
This is sub task 9 and focuses on chapter 8.
Attached you will find ten documents:
1. Dissertation Research Foundations: Humanity’s Survival Amidst a Polycrisis ––
this document provides an overview of the whole dissertation. You should treat this as your map to the dissertation and how the current sub task fits in
2. Toward a Dissertation: Outline and Contributions – the dissertation chapter outline. Use this to position the chapter you are currently working on (this sub task) in the bigger narrative arc.
3. Starting Point References – this is a list of references you should use as a starting point. However, you should do your own deep and iterative research for the chapter that goes well beyond these
4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.
Chapter 1 D1 – the first chapter of the dissertation
Chapter 2 D1 – the second chapter of the dissertation
Chapter 3 D1 – the third chapter of the dissertation
Chapter 4 D1 – the fourth chapter of the dissertation
Chapter 5 D1 – the fifth chapter of the dissertation
Chapter 6 D1 – the sixth chapter of the dissertation
10. Chapter 7 D1 – the preceding chapter of the dissertation
You should use these to ensure chapter 8 fits into the overarching narrative and direction of the dissertation.
You will find specific instructions on the sub task below, and a reminder of the dissertation research questions
You should rely primarily on academic and scholarly literature. You should use a snowball approach to your research, following leads in available literature to develop your ideas and understanding until you reach a saturation point.
You should demonstrate deep scholarship in your research. Your goal is to be creative and insightful in teasing out new and potentially transformative knowledge from your research through the dissertation, and the provided map should guide you here.The dissertation chapter should result in you significantly extending the boundaries of what is known in three interconnected areas.
Your research methods should be grounded in a deep dive into all relevant academic and scholarly literature, again using a snowball approach until saturation is reached; using your brilliant scholarship and intellect to draw out new knowledge and insights from connections and patterns within and across the literature; and using your intellect and deep scholarship to synthesize these into clear, original and impactful knowledge outputs.
You should ground your approach in philosophy but not be bound by this – taking an approach that transcends disciplinary boundaries to generate new knowledge and insights.
====================
SUB TASK 9
===================
Chapter 8: Conclusion – Knowledge Contributions and the Way Forward
In this sub task you will be researching and writing chapter 8. Please make sure you refer to the supporting documents so that the chapter fits in with the overall dissertation.
The concluding chapter will summarize the key findings and theoretical contributions of the dissertation. It will revisit the research questions – confirming, for instance, that evidence suggests we are entering a qualitatively new polycrisis (with caveats learned from history), and that a complexity-resilience lens yields new understanding of crisis interactions. It will highlight any novel insights generated (e.g., identification of a previously under-recognized feedback loop, or a synthesis bridging philosophical and scientific perspectives on survival). The chapter will also reflect on the limits of the research (uncertainties, areas not covered) and suggest avenues for future inquiry.
Importantly, it will aim to end on a constructive note: how this research can inform policy, public discourse, or further academic work to help steer humanity through the polycrisis. (Key themes: synthesis of interdisciplinary insights, hope vs warning, call for transformative action or further research.)
You should use a snowball approach in your research where you follow new leads until you reach saturation.
The chapter should be around 10,000 words long
When your research is complete I would like you to deliver the following:
1. A complete and comprehensive draft of chapter 8====================
DISSERTATION GUIDING QUESTIONS
===================
As a reminder, the overarching question of the dissertation is:
Can humanity survive the emerging polycrisis of environmental stressors, sociopolitical upheaval, and technological acceleration?
This encompasses three sub-questions:
1. 2. 3. Is there evidence that humanity is entering a period of polycrisis that is unlike any previous point in history? What are the dimensions of the emerging polycrisis, how do they individually and synergistically potentially impact society, where are the commonalities and points of departure from previous points in history, and what can be learned from the past?
How might human survival be understood in the context of this research? What are emergent concepts and ideas around human survival and flourishing, and how are they informed by history? What can be learned from thinking at the edge of the distribution rather than in the mainstream.
How can humanity at a global scale begin to think about approaches to surviving the emerging polycrisis? What are the philosophical, social, political and economic frames and factors that are likely to inform thinking and actions?
The dissertation should be grounded in scholarship and philosophical thought. Your research method should draw on a wide range of sources and thought that span human history — up to the present — to generate new ideas, understanding, and insights.
Questions from Deep Research after the prompt above and before research and writing began:
Deep Research:
Before proceeding with drafting Chapter 8, I want to confirm a few key points to ensure alignment with your vision:
1. Scope and Focus: Should the conclusion primarily summarize key findings and theoretical contributions, or also emphasize policy and practical implications?2. 3. 4. Thematic Emphasis: Are there specific novel insights from previous chapters that you want to be particularly emphasized?
Future Directions: Should the discussion on future research and policy be broad, or should it focus on specific recommendations?
Tone and Framing: Should the conclusion lean more toward a hopeful, action- oriented perspective or a cautionary, reflective one?
Your guidance will help shape the most impactful final chapter.
Me:
1. 2. 3. 4. You should summarize key findings from the previous chapters (please read them carefully), but have a section that explores policy and practical implications
I will leave it to your expert judgment what to emphasize from the preceding chapters. You should look for overarching themes and insights here. Remember that as this is a PhD dissertation you are expected to draw out novel insights from your work, and no simply summarize the work of others.
I think given the scope and depth of the research it’s OK to focus on specific recommendations. Draw on the research in the preceding chapters.
I think you should be a neutral party here and so be reflective, cautionary where the evidence suggests this is appropriate, and likewise hopeful if you see reason for hope.
Finally, remember that as this is a PhD dissertation you are expected to generate new knowledge that pushes the boundaries of understanding