使用深度研究的ChatGPT论文写作
OpenAI ChatGPT 4o深度研究版
您是一名正在撰写博士论文的优秀研究生。由于最终论文将包含多个章节，总计约70,000词，您需要将其分解为若干子任务。
当前是子任务7，专注于第六章的写作。
附上八份文档供您参考：
- 论文研究基础：《多重危机下的人类生存》——本文档提供整篇论文的概览，应作为论文路线图，帮助理解当前子任务的定位
- 论文纲要与贡献——论文章节纲要，用于确定当前章节在整体叙事中的位置
- 起始参考文献——基础文献清单，但需通过自主深度迭代研究超越这些文献
4-8. 第一至第五章——需通过这些章节确保第六章与论文整体叙事方向一致
后续将提供子任务具体说明及论文研究问题提醒。
研究准则：
• 主要依托学术文献资源
• 采用滚雪球研究法追踪文献线索直至达到饱和点
• 展现深厚学术素养，通过论文研究创造性地提炼具有变革潜力的新知识
• 本章节需在三个相互关联的领域显著拓展认知边界
• 研究方法应：深度研读文献直至饱和；运用学术智慧从文献联系与模式中提炼新认知；通过综合整合形成清晰原创的知识成果
• 立足哲学基础但超越学科界限生成新见解
====================
【子任务7】
====================
第六章：危机中的人类生存——叙事与策略
本章重点研究人类在危机条件下如何概念化生存与繁荣，需：
• 对比主流叙事（可持续性、全球目标、韧性规划）与替代性叙事（崩溃接纳、深度适应、激进变革）
• 采用渐进式结构：先讨论改革与技术解决方案的乐观设想（引用联合国、世界经济论坛等主张），再分析悲观或激进情境（引用崩溃学家、灭绝哲学家等观点）
• 批判性评估不同叙事的合理性与影响，辨析各叙事中”繁荣”的涵义差异
• 纳入实证案例（如践行去增长理念的社区、实施幸福经济框架的国家）
• 核心主题：未来愿景差异、生存与繁荣之辩、希望与现实主义价值
研究要求：
• 采用滚雪球研究法直至饱和
• 章节长度约20,000词
最终交付成果：第六章完整草案
====================
【论文核心问题】
====================
总体研究问题：
人类能否在环境压力、社会政治动荡与技术加速构成的多重危机中存续？
子问题框架：
- 人类是否正面临史无前例的多重危机？其维度如何？个体与协同效应如何影响社会？与历史危机的异同点及历史经验启示？
- 本研究背景下如何理解人类生存？关于生存与繁荣的新兴概念如何被历史塑造？边缘思想的启示价值？
- 全球尺度下应对多重危机的思路框架？可能影响决策的哲学、社会、政治与经济因素？
研究基础：
• 立足学术与哲学思想
• 纵贯人类历史的跨学科研究
• 注重创新理念与洞察力的生成
====================
【深度研究确认】
====================
经确认的写作方向：
• 分析重点：兼顾但侧重替代性生存叙事
• 实证案例：自主选择典型案例（如去增长社区、不丹幸福经济、联合国可持续倡议）
• 哲学角度：融入深度哲学思辨（如生存风险、后崩溃伦理）
• 结构设计：采用渐进式叙事结构
• 章节衔接：重点对接第五章内容，强化整体连贯性
****************************************************
ChatGPT Dissertation Writing using Deep Research
OpenAI ChatGPT 4o with Deep Research
You are a brilliant PhD student writing your PhD. As the final dissertation will consist of several chapters and will be around 70,000 words long you are breaking this down into a number of sub tasks.
This is sub task 7 and focuses on chapter 6.
Attached you will find eight documents:
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Dissertation Research Foundations: Humanity’s Survival Amidst a Polycrisis ––
this document provides an overview of the whole dissertation. You should treat this as your map to the dissertation and how the current sub task fits in
Toward a Dissertation: Outline and Contributions – the dissertation chapter outline. Use this to position the chapter you are currently working on (this sub task) in the bigger narrative arc.
Starting Point References – this is a list of references you should use as a starting point. However, you should do your own deep and iterative research for the chapter
that goes well beyond these
Chapter 1 D1 – the first chapter of the dissertation
Chapter 2 D1 – the second chapter of the dissertation
Chapter 3 D1 – the third chapter of the dissertation
Chapter 4 D1 – the fourth chapter of the dissertation
Chapter 5 D1 – the preceding chapter of the dissertation
You should use these to ensure chapter 6 fits into the overarching narrative and direction of the dissertation.
You will find specific instructions on the sub task below, and a reminder of the dissertation research questions
You should rely primarily on academic and scholarly literature. You should use a snowball approach to your research, following leads in available literature to develop your ideas and understanding until you reach a saturation point.
You should demonstrate deep scholarship in your research. Your goal is to be creative and insightful in teasing out new and potentially transformative knowledge from your research through the dissertation, and the provided map should guide you here.The dissertation chapter should result in you significantly extending the boundaries of what is known in three interconnected areas.
Your research methods should be grounded in a deep dive into all relevant academic and scholarly literature, again using a snowball approach until saturation is reached; using your brilliant scholarship and intellect to draw out new knowledge and insights from connections and patterns within and across the literature; and using your intellect and deep scholarship to synthesize these into clear, original and impactful knowledge outputs.
You should ground your approach in philosophy but not be bound by this – taking an approach that transcends disciplinary boundaries to generate new knowledge and insights.
====================
SUB TASK 7
===================
Chapter 6: Human Survival in Crisis – Narratives and Strategies
In this sub task you will be researching and writing chapter 6. Please make sure you refer to the supporting documents so that the chapter fits in with the overall dissertation.
This chapter addresses how humanity conceptualizes and approaches survival and flourishing under crisis conditions. It will likely contrast Mainstream Narratives (sustainability, global goals, resilience planning) with Alternative Narratives (collapse acceptance, deep adaptation, radical change) as described in the previous chapter. It may be useful to organize it as a dialogue or spectrum – e.g., one part discussing the optimistic scenario of reform and tech-solutions (citing proponents from UN, WEF, etc.), and another part discussing pessimistic or radical scenarios (citing collapsologists, philosophers of extinction, etc.). The chapter will not just list ideas but critically analyze their plausibility and implications. For instance, it might evaluate what “flourishing” means in each narrative: mainstream might say it’s maintaining economic growth with green tech, whereas an alternative might say it’s a spiritual/cultural renaissance after a downsizing of civilization. Empirical examples or pilot projects (like communities already practicing degrowth or nations adopting well-being economy frameworks) can be included. (Key themes: differing visions of the future, survival vs flourishing debate, value of hope vs realism.)
You should use a snowball approach in your research where you follow new leads until you reach saturation.
The chapter should be around 20,000 words long
When your research is complete I would like you to deliver the following:1. A complete and comprehensive draft of chapter 6
====================
DISSERTATION GUIDING QUESTIONS
===================
As a reminder, the overarching question of the dissertation is:
Can humanity survive the emerging polycrisis of environmental stressors, sociopolitical upheaval, and technological acceleration?
This encompasses three sub-questions:
1. 2. 3. Is there evidence that humanity is entering a period of polycrisis that is unlike any previous point in history? What are the dimensions of the emerging polycrisis, how do they individually and synergistically potentially impact society, where are the commonalities and points of departure from previous points in history, and what can be learned from the past?
How might human survival be understood in the context of this research? What are emergent concepts and ideas around human survival and flourishing, and how are they informed by history? What can be learned from thinking at the edge of the distribution rather than in the mainstream.
How can humanity at a global scale begin to think about approaches to surviving the emerging polycrisis? What are the philosophical, social, political and economic frames and factors that are likely to inform thinking and actions?
The dissertation should be grounded in scholarship and philosophical thought. Your research method should draw on a wide range of sources and thought that span human history — up to the present — to generate new ideas, understanding, and insights.
Questions from Deep Research after the prompt above and before research and writing began:
Deep Research:Before proceeding with drafting Chapter 6, could you confirm the following details to ensure alignment with your dissertation’s overarching structure and objectives?
• Analytical Focus: Would you like a balanced analysis of both mainstream and alternative survival narratives, or should one receive more emphasis?
• Empirical Examples: Are there specific case studies, communities, or policies you would like to be included (e.g., degrowth communities, Bhutan’s well-being economy, UN sustainability initiatives)?
• Philosophical Angle: Should the chapter incorporate deep philosophical reflections on human survival (e.g., existential risk, post-collapse ethics), or should it be more policy/practice-oriented?
• Structure: Do you prefer a comparative structure (contrasting mainstream vs. alternative views in each section) or a progressive narrative (exploring mainstream, then transitioning into alternatives)?
• Integration with Previous Chapters: Are there key arguments or themes from earlier chapters that should be explicitly referenced or expanded upon?
These points will help ensure that Chapter 6 is cohesive with the dissertation’s broader framework and contributes to its intellectual impact.
Me:
• Analytical focus: As this is a PhD dissertation let’s do both but emphasize alternative survival narratives
• Empirical examples: I’d like you to chose appropriate empirical examples. These suggestions are good starting points
• Philosophical angle: Yes, season this but incorporate deep philosophical reasoning
• Structure: Progressive
• Integration with previous chapters: Please look through previous chapters with an emphasis on chapter 5 to ensure integration