使用深度研究的ChatGPT论文写作
OpenAI ChatGPT 4o深度研究版
您是一名正在撰写博士论文的优秀研究生。由于最终论文将包含多个章节，总计约70,000词，您需要将其分解为若干子任务。
当前子任务4聚焦于第三章。
您将收到五份文档：
- 论文研究基础：《多重危机下的人类生存》——本文档提供整篇论文的概览，应作为论文路线图，帮助理解当前子任务的定位
- 论文大纲与贡献：包含各章节纲要，用于定位当前章节在整体叙事中的位置
- 起点参考文献：作为研究起点的文献清单，但需通过自主深度迭代研究超越这些文献
- 第一章草案
- 第二章草案
这些材料将帮助确保第三章与论文的整体叙事和方向保持一致。
请遵循以下具体任务说明及论文研究问题提示：
• 主要依托学术文献资源
• 采用滚雪球式研究法，循着文献线索深化认知直至达到饱和点
• 展现深厚的学术素养，通过论文研究创造性地提炼具有变革潜力的新知识
• 最终应在三个相互关联的领域显著拓展认知边界
• 研究方法应立足哲学基础但不受其限制，通过跨学科路径生成新知识
====================
子任务3
===================
第三章：历史比较分析
本任务要求撰写约20,000词的第三章，需注意：
• 考察历史上多重危机的典型案例，与当代形势进行对比
• 可采用时间顺序（如“17世纪危机”“20世纪全球危机”）或主题式结构（如治理失效、适应能力）
• 总结社会应对机制与历史教训
• 重点分析共同模式（如治理失灵、适应性）与21世纪独特性（全球规模、人类世条件）
研究要求：
• 深度全面，广泛引用学术出版物
• 持续采用滚雪球研究法直至达到饱和
最终提交：完整的第二章草案（注：原文此处似有笔误，根据上下文应为第三章）
====================
论文核心问题
===================
总研究问题：
人类能否在环境压力、社会政治动荡与技术加速构成的多重危机中持续生存？
子问题：
- 是否存在证据表明人类正面临史上空前的多重危机？新危机的维度、协同效应、历史异同点及可借鉴教训为何？
- 本研究框架下如何理解人类生存？关于生存与繁荣的新概念如何受历史启示？边缘思维相较于主流思想的独特价值？
- 全球层面应对多重危机的可能路径？可能影响决策的哲学、社会、政治及经济框架因素？
研究准则：
• 立足学术与哲学思想
• 纵贯人类历史的跨时空研究
• 注重新理念的生成
深度研究问答澄清：
- 结构偏好：主题式优先
- 历史案例：请自主选择相关案例
- 比较重点：突出21世纪危机独特性
- 研究方法：哲学视角优先，系统分析次之
- 文献来源：依托前章文献综述，继续采用滚雪球研究法
***********************************************************
ChatGPT Dissertation Writing using Deep Research
OpenAI ChatGPT 4o with Deep Research
You are a brilliant PhD student writing your PhD. As the final dissertation will consist of several chapters and will be around 70,000 words long you are breaking this down into a number of sub tasks.
This is sub task 4 and focuses on chapter 3.
Attached you will find five documents:
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Dissertation Research Foundations: Humanity’s Survival Amidst a Polycrisis ––
this document provides an overview of the whole dissertation. You should treat this as your map to the dissertation and how the current sub task fits in
Toward a Dissertation: Outline and Contributions – the dissertation chapter outline. Use this to position the chapter you are currently working on (this sub task) in the bigger narrative arc.
Starting Point References – this is a list of references you should use as a starting point. However, you should do your own deep and iterative research for the chapter that goes well beyond these
Chapter 1 D1 – the first chapter of the dissertation
Chapter 2 D1 – the preceding chapter of the dissertation
You should use these to ensure chapter 3 fits into the overarching narrative and direction of the dissertation.
You will find specific instructions on the sub task below, and a reminder of the dissertation research questions
You should rely primarily on academic and scholarly literature. You should use a snowball approach to your research, following leads in available literature to develop your ideas and understanding until you reach a saturation point.
You should demonstrate deep scholarship in your research. Your goal is to be creative and insightful in teasing out new and potentially transformative knowledge from your research through the dissertation, and the provided map should guide you here.
The dissertation chapter should result in you significantly extending the boundaries of what is known in three interconnected areas.
Your research methods should be grounded in a deep dive into all relevant academic and scholarly literature, again using a snowball approach until saturation is reached; usingyour brilliant scholarship and intellect to draw out new knowledge and insights from connections and patterns within and across the literature; and using your intellect and deep scholarship to synthesize these into clear, original and impactful knowledge outputs.
You should ground your approach in philosophy but not be bound by this – taking an approach that transcends disciplinary boundaries to generate new knowledge and insights.
====================
SUB TASK 3
===================
Chapter 3: 2. Historical Comparative Analysis
In this sub task you will be researching and writing chapter 3. Please make sure you refer to the supporting documents so that the chapter fits in with the overall dissertation.
This chapter will delve into historical cases of multi-faceted crises, comparing them with the current situation. It may be organized chronologically or thematically (e.g., “The 17th Century Crisis,” “20th Century Global Crises”) and draw lessons about social responses and outcomes. The analysis will highlight common patterns (e.g., governance failure, adaptability) and what differentiates the 21st century (global scale, Anthropocene conditions)
Your research should be deep and comprehensive. It should draw extensively on academic and scholarly papers, books and other publications.
You should use a snowball approach in your research where you follow new leads until you reach saturation.
The chapter should be around 20,000 words long
When your research is complete I would like you to deliver the following:
1. A complete and comprehensive draft of chapter 2
====================
DISSERTATION GUIDING QUESTIONS
===================
As a reminder, the overarching question of the dissertation is:Can humanity survive the emerging polycrisis of environmental stressors, sociopolitical
upheaval, and technological acceleration?
This encompasses three sub-questions:
1. 2. 3. Is there evidence that humanity is entering a period of polycrisis that is unlike any previous point in history? What are the dimensions of the emerging polycrisis, how do they individually and synergistically potentially impact society, where are the commonalities and points of departure from previous points in history, and what can be learned from the past?
How might human survival be understood in the context of this research? What are emergent concepts and ideas around human survival and flourishing, and how are they informed by history? What can be learned from thinking at the edge of the distribution rather than in the mainstream.
How can humanity at a global scale begin to think about approaches to surviving the emerging polycrisis? What are the philosophical, social, political and economic frames and factors that are likely to inform thinking and actions?
The dissertation should be grounded in scholarship and philosophical thought. Your research method should draw on a wide range of sources and thought that span human history — up to the present — to generate new ideas, understanding, and insights.
Questions from Deep Research after the prompt above and before research and writing began:
Deep Research:
To ensure Chapter 3 aligns with your dissertation’s overarching narrative, could you clarify the following details:
1. 2. 3. 4. Structure Preference: Should the historical comparative analysis be structured chronologically (e.g., major crises by century) or thematically (e.g., governance failure, resilience patterns)?
Historical Cases: Are there specific historical crises you want to prioritize (e.g., Black Death, World Wars, 17th-century crises, financial crashes)?
Comparative Focus: Should the analysis primarily highlight common patterns across crises, or emphasize the unique aspects of the 21st-century polycrisis?
Interdisciplinary Approach: How much emphasis should be placed on philosophical perspectives, systemic analysis, or policy implications?5. Additional Sources: Beyond the starting references provided, are there particular sources, historians, or theoretical frameworks you want to be incorporated?
This will help shape a well-integrated and insightful chapter. Let me know your preferences!
Me:
1. Thematically
2. Please select relevant ones
3. unique aspects of 21st century crises
4. Philosophical first, then systemic analysis
5. I’ll leave this up to your research — remember to draw on the previous chapter
(literature review) and use a snowball research approach