ChatGPT 学术论文写作：运用深度研究
OpenAI ChatGPT 4o 深度研究版
你是一名才华横溢的博士生，正在撰写你的博士论文。由于最终论文将由数个章节组成，总计约 70,000 词，你正将其分解为若干子任务。
这是子任务 3，专注于第 2 章。
你将找到以下三份文件：
- 论文研究基础：《多重危机下的人类生存》——这份文件提供了整篇论文的概览。你应将其视为你的论文地图，并了解当前子任务如何融入整体。
- 论文进展：大纲与贡献——论文章节大纲。用它来定位你当前正在撰写的章节（本子任务）在更大叙事弧中的位置。
- 起点参考文献——这是一份参考文献列表，你应将其作为起点。然而，你应为本章进行自己深入且迭代的研究，范围应远超这些文献。
- 第 1 章 D1——论文的前一个章节。
你将在下方找到关于此子任务的具体说明，以及论文研究问题的提醒。
你应主要依赖学术和学者文献。你应在研究中使用滚雪球方法，追踪现有文献中的线索以发展你的想法和理解，直至达到饱和点。
你应在研究中展现出深厚的学术素养。你的目标是富有创造力和洞察力，通过你的研究和提供的路线图，从研究中梳理出新的、具有潜在变革性的知识。
论文章节的成果应是你在三个相互关联的领域显著扩展已知知识的边界。
你的研究方法应基于对所有相关学术和学者文献的深入探究，再次使用滚雪球方法直至饱和；运用你卓越的学术素养和才智，从文献内部和跨文献的联系与模式中提取新知识和见解；并运用你的才智和深厚学术素养，将这些综合成清晰、原创且有影响力的知识产出。
你的方法应植根于哲学，但不受其束缚——采取一种超越学科界限的方法来生成新知识和见解。
====================
子任务 3
===================
第 2 章：文献综述——从危机到多重危机：
在此子任务中，你将研究并撰写第 2 章。请确保参考支撑文件，以使本章与整篇论文相契合。
本章将呈现跨领域的全面文献综述。本章将审视危机是如何被研究的（例如，在环境科学、经济学、安全研究中），多重危机概念的出现，以及关于其新颖性的辩论。它还将涵盖可用的理论框架（复杂性、韧性等）并找出研究空白。在本章结束时，应描绘出相关的学术版图，并确立选择特定理论透镜的理由。（关键主题：定义、对多重危机的批判、新综合的必要性。）
你的研究应深入且全面。应广泛借鉴学术论文、书籍和其他出版物。
你应在研究中使用滚雪球方法，追踪新线索直至达到饱和。
本章长度应约为 20,000 词。
研究完成后，请交付以下内容：
- 第 2 章的完整全面草稿。
- 本章引用的所有相关学术论文、书籍和其他出版物的完整、全面的参考文献目录。
请使用带编号格式的文内引用（例如 [1] [2] 等）。请确保每个文内引用都指向参考文献目录中带编号的条目。
====================
论文指导性问题
===================
提醒一下，论文的总体问题是：
人类能否在环境压力源、社会政治动荡和技术加速所构成的新兴多重危机中生存下来？
这包含三个子问题：
- 是否有证据表明人类正在进入一个不同于历史上任何以往时期的多重危机阶段？新兴多重危机的维度是什么？它们如何单独及协同地潜在影响社会？与历史过往相比，共同点和分歧点在哪里？可以从过去学到什么？
- 在这项研究的背景下，如何理解人类的生存？关于人类生存和繁荣的新兴概念和思想有哪些？历史如何为它们提供信息？从分布边缘而非主流进行思考能学到什么？
- 全球范围内的人类如何开始思考应对新兴多重危机以求生存的方法？可能影响思考和行动的哲学、社会、政治和经济框架及因素是什么？
论文应植根于学术和哲学思想。你的研究方法应利用跨越人类历史——直至当下——的广泛来源和思想，以产生新的想法、理解和见解。
在上述提示之后、研究和写作开始之前，深度研究提出的问题：
深度研究：
在我着手深入研究和起草你的论文第 2 章之前，我想澄清几点以确保符合你的期望：
- 理论框架范围：虽然你提到了复杂性理论、韧性理论和系统思维，是否需要探讨其他框架（例如，混沌理论、突变理论、深度适应或世界体系理论）？
- 辩论焦点：我是否应深入探讨对多重危机概念的批判和潜在的反驳论点（例如，危机一直是相互关联的，这并非史无前例）？还是重点应更多地放在将多重危机确立为一个独特且紧迫的现象上？
- 实证案例研究：是否希望将具体的案例研究融入文献综述中？例如，历史上的多重危机如 14 世纪的黑死病和经济危机，或现代案例如 COVID-19 大流行、2008 年金融危机和乌克兰战争？
- 跨学科整合：由于你的论文超越学科界限，我是否应确保文献综述除了危机研究之外，还汲取哲学、政治经济学、环境科学和全球治理等领域的文献？
- 写作风格与结构：我应遵循具有明确定义子章节（例如，定义、理论框架、历史视角、批判与研究空白）的结构化格式，还是你更倾向于更流畅、论证性的风格？
- 参考文献格式：你指定了使用编号的文内引用（例如 [1], [2]）。参考文献目录是否应遵循哈佛格式、APA 格式或其他特定样式？
澄清这些细节将确保最终草稿完全符合你的期望。请告诉我你希望我如何进行！
我的回复：
- 是的——我在此需要深度和广度的学术研究。
- 请务必深入探讨辩论，但你需要理清自己的思路，为论文的后续部分做好铺垫。
- 这样很好。
- 是的。
- 我希望采用更流畅的论证风格，但鉴于这是文献综述，一定的结构安排会有所帮助。
- 请使用哈佛格式。
**************************************************
ChatGPT Dissertation Writing using Deep Research
OpenAI ChatGPT 4o with Deep Research
You are a brilliant PhD student writing your PhD. As the final dissertation will consist of several chapters and will be around 70,000 words long you are breaking this down into a number of sub tasks.
This is sub task 3 and focuses on chapter 2.
Attached you will find three documents:
1. 2. 3. 4. Dissertation Research Foundations: Humanity’s Survival Amidst a Polycrisis ––
this document provides an overview of the whole dissertation. You should treat this as your map to the dissertation and how the current sub task fits in
Toward a Dissertation: Outline and Contributions – the dissertation chapter outline. Use this to position the chapter you are currently working on (this sub task) in the bigger narrative arc.
Starting Point References – this is a list of references you should use as a starting point. However, you should do your own deep and iterative research for the chapter that goes well beyond these Chapter 1 D1 – the preceding chapter of the dissertation
You will find specific instructions on the sub task below, and a reminder of the dissertation
research questions
You should rely primarily on academic and scholarly literature. You should use a snowball approach to your research, following leads in available literature to develop your ideas and understanding until you reach a saturation point.
You should demonstrate deep scholarship in your research. Your goal is to be creative and insightful in teasing out new and potentially transformative knowledge from your research through the dissertation, and the provided map should guide you here.
The dissertation chapter should result in you significantly extending the boundaries of what is known in three interconnected areas.Your research methods should be grounded in a deep dive into all relevant academic and scholarly literature, again using a snowball approach until saturation is reached; using your brilliant scholarship and intellect to draw out new knowledge and insights from connections and patterns within and across the literature; and using your intellect and deep scholarship to synthesize these into clear, original and impactful knowledge outputs.
You should ground your approach in philosophy but not be bound by this – taking an approach that transcends disciplinary boundaries to generate new knowledge and insights.
====================
SUB TASK 3
===================
Chapter 2: 2. Literature Review – From Crisis to Polycrisis:
In this sub task you will be researching and writing chapter 2. Please make sure you refer to the supporting documents so that the chapter fits in with the overall dissertation.
This chapter provides a comprehensive review of literature across fields will be presented here. The chapter will survey how crises have been studied (e.g., in environmental science, economics, security studies), the emergence of the polycrisis concept, and debates around its novelty. It will also cover theoretical frameworks available (complexity, resilience, etc.) and identify gaps. By the end of this chapter, the intellectual landscape is mapped and the rationale for the chosen theoretical lens is established. (Key themes: definitions, critiques of polycrisis, need for new synthesis.)
Your research should be deep and comprehensive. It should draw extensively on academic and scholarly papers, books and other publications.
You should use a snowball approach in your research where you follow new leads until you reach saturation.
The chapter should be around 20,000 words long
When your research is complete I would like you to deliver the following:
1. A complete and comprehensive draft of chapter 22. A full, complete and comprehensive bibliography of all relevant academic and scholarly papers, books and other publications that are cited in the chapter
Please use in text citations using number formatting (e.g. [1] [2] etc). Please make sure that every in text citation refers to a numbered reference in the bibliography
====================
DISSERTATION GUIDING QUESTIONS
===================
As a reminder, the overarching question of the dissertation is:
Can humanity survive the emerging polycrisis of environmental stressors, sociopolitical upheaval, and technological acceleration?
This encompasses three sub-questions:
1. 2. 3. Is there evidence that humanity is entering a period of polycrisis that is unlike any previous point in history? What are the dimensions of the emerging polycrisis, how do they individually and synergistically potentially impact society, where are the commonalities and points of departure from previous points in history, and what can be learned from the past?
How might human survival be understood in the context of this research? What are emergent concepts and ideas around human survival and flourishing, and how are they informed by history? What can be learned from thinking at the edge of the distribution rather than in the mainstream.
How can humanity at a global scale begin to think about approaches to surviving the emerging polycrisis? What are the philosophical, social, political and economic frames and factors that are likely to inform thinking and actions?
The dissertation should be grounded in scholarship and philosophical thought. Your research method should draw on a wide range of sources and thought that span human history — up to the present — to generate new ideas, understanding, and insights.
Questions from Deep Research after the prompt above and before research and
writing began:
Deep Research:Before I proceed with in-depth research and drafting Chapter 2 of your dissertation, I’d like to clarify a few points to ensure alignment with your expectations:
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Scope of Theoretical Frameworks: While you mentioned complexity theory, resilience theory, and systems thinking, do you want additional frameworks explored (e.g., chaos theory, catastrophe theory, deep adaptation, or world- systems theory)?
Focus on Debates: Should I engage deeply with critiques of the polycrisis concept and potential counterarguments (e.g., that crises have always been interconnected, and this is not unprecedented)? Or should the emphasis be more on establishing polycrisis as a unique and pressing phenomenon?
Empirical Case Studies: Would you like specific case studies woven into the literature review? For instance, historical polycrises like the 14th-century Black
Death and economic crises, or modern cases such as the COVID-19 pandemic, 2008 financial crisis, and the Ukraine war?
Interdisciplinary Integration: Since your dissertation transcends disciplinary boundaries, should I ensure that the literature review pulls from philosophy,
political economy, environmental science, and global governance in addition to crisis studies?
Writing Style and Structure: Should I follow a structured format with clearly defined subsections (e.g., Definitions, Theoretical Frameworks, Historical
Perspectives, Critiques, and Research Gaps), or would you prefer a more fluid, argumentative style?
Bibliography Format: You specified in-text citations using numbering (e.g., [1], [2]).
Should the bibliography follow Harvard, APA, or another specific style?
Clarifying these details will ensure that the final draft meets your expectations precisely.
Let me know how you’d like me to proceed!
Me:
1. 2. Yes please — I need deep and wide scholarship here
Please do engage deeply with debates, but you need to resolve your thinking in a way that tees up the rest of the dissertation
3. This would be good
4. Yes please
5. I would like a more fluid argumentative style, but as this is a literature review, some structuring would be helpful 6. Harvard please