使用深度研究的ChatGPT论文写作
OpenAI ChatGPT 4o 与深度研究

你是一名才华横溢的博士生，正在撰写你的博士论文。由于最终论文将包含数个章节，总计约70,000字，你正将其分解为若干子任务。

这是子任务2，专注于第一章。

您将找到三份附件文档：

2. 3. 论文研究基础：多重危机中的人类生存——这份文档提供了整个论文的概述。你应将其视为你的论文地图，并理解当前子任务在其中的位置。
   论文进展：大纲与贡献——论文章节大纲。使用此大纲来定位你当前正在撰写的章节（本子任务）在更大叙事脉络中的位置。
   起始参考文献——这是一份参考文献列表，你应将其作为起点。然而，你需要为本章节进行自己深入且迭代的研究，远远超出这些参考文献的范围。

您还将在下文找到关于此子任务的具体说明，以及论文研究问题的提醒。

你应主要依赖学术和学者文献。你应采用滚雪球式的研究方法，追踪现有文献中的线索，以发展你的想法和理解，直至达到饱和点。

你应在研究中展现出深厚的学术素养。你的目标是富有创造力和洞察力，从你的研究及整篇论文中梳理出新的、具有潜在变革性的知识，而你在第一个子任务中绘制的地图应指导后续的每个子任务实现这一目标。

论文章节的成果应使你在三个相互关联的领域显著拓展已知知识的边界。

你的研究方法应基于对所有相关学术文献的深入探究，再次使用滚雪球方法直至饱和；运用你卓越的学术素养和才智，从文献内部和跨文献的联系与模式中提取新的知识和见解；并运用你的才智和深厚学术素养，将这些综合成清晰、原创且有影响力的知识产出。

你的方法应植根于哲学，但又不拘泥于此——采取一种超越学科界限的方法来生成新的知识和见解。

====================

子任务 2

第一章：引言——构建多重危机框架：

在此子任务中，你将研究并撰写第一章。请确保参考支持性文档，以使本章节与整体论文相契合。

本章将介绍研究问题和研究问题，在具体情境中定义”多重危机”，并解释其重要性。它将概述跨学科研究方法，并提供论文的路线图。（关键主题：为何使用多重危机概念、人类的紧迫性、分析范围。）

你的研究应当深入且全面。应广泛借鉴学术论文、书籍和其他出版物。

你应在研究中使用滚雪球方法，追踪新的线索，直至达到饱和点。

本章长度应在10,000至20,000字之间。

研究完成后，我希望你提交以下内容：

2. 第一章完整全面的草稿
   所有相关学术论文、书籍及其他出版物的完整、全面的列表

在你返回完成的草稿之前，我希望你检查并按以下两种方式进行编辑：

2. 将所有文内网页链接替换为作者-日期格式的引用
   确保每个文内引用在参考文献部分都有对应的条目

使用哈佛格式规范。

====================

论文指导性问题

提醒一下，论文的总体问题是：
人类能否在环境压力、社会政治动荡和技术加速所构成的新兴多重危机中生存下来？

这包含三个子问题：

2. 3. 是否有证据表明人类正在进入一个不同于历史上任何以往时期的多重危机阶段？新兴多重危机的维度是什么？它们如何单独及协同地潜在地影响社会？与历史以往时期相比，共性和差异点在哪里？可以从过去学到什么？
   在这项研究的背景下，应如何理解人类的生存？关于人类生存和繁荣出现了哪些新概念和新思想？它们如何从历史中汲取信息？从分布边缘而非主流进行思考可以学到什么？
   全球范围内的人类如何开始思考应对新兴多重危机以求生存的方法？可能影响思考和行动的哲学、社会、政治和经济框架及因素是什么？

论文应植根于学术素养和哲学思想。你的研究方法应借鉴涵盖人类历史——直至当下——的广泛来源和思想，以产生新的想法、理解和见解。

在上述提示之后、研究与写作开始之前，深度研究提出的问题：

深度研究：
在我开始起草论文第一章之前，我想澄清几点，以确保与您的设想一致：

2. 3. 4. 5. 范围与重点：除了定义多重危机及其重要性之外，您是否希望在引言中强调特定的角度或论点（例如，历史比较、紧迫性、哲学框架）？
   跨学科视角：您的论文采用超学科方法。此引言是否应概述所整合的关键学科（复杂性科学、韧性理论、政治经济学等），还是您更愿意在后续章节中更深入地介绍它们？
   叙事与结构：您对第一章有偏好的结构吗？例如：
   o 背景与问题陈述
   o 定义多重危机
   o 研究问题的论证
   o 跨学科方法
   o 论文路线图
   理论基础：本章是否应涉及关于多重危机的概念性辩论（例如，图兹、莫兰，以及对该术语的批评），还是将这些讨论留到文献综述部分？
   目标字数：您提到10,000到20,000字——您倾向于更全面还是更简洁的引言？

请告知您的偏好，以便我相应地调整研究和写作！

我（用户）的回复：

2. 3. 4. 你应采取超学科方法，但强调哲学框架和历史比较。
   不要提供各学科的概述，但要深入贯彻超学科方法。
   这个结构看起来不错。专注于优雅且有说服力的行文。
   我认为你可以在构建框架时引入概念性辩论，但请记住本章也在为后续论文做好铺垫。
3. 倾向于10,000字左右。

**************************************************

ChatGPT Dissertation Writing using Deep Research

OpenAI ChatGPT 4o with Deep Research

You are a brilliant PhD student writing your PhD. As the final dissertation will consist of several chapters and will be around 70,000 words long you are breaking this down into a number of sub tasks.

This is sub task 2 and focuses on chapter 1.

Attached you will find three documents:

1. 2. 3. Dissertation Research Foundations: Humanity’s Survival Amidst a Polycrisis ––

this document provides an overview of the whole dissertation. You should treat this as your map to the dissertation and how the current sub task fits in

Toward a Dissertation: Outline and Contributions – the dissertation chapter outline. Use this to position the chapter you are currently working on (this sub task) in the bigger narrative arc.

Starting Point References – this is a list of references you should use as a starting point. However, you should do your own deep and iterative research for the chapter that goes well beyond these

You will also find specific instructions on the sub task below, and a reminder of the

dissertation research questions

You should rely primarily on academic and scholarly literature. You should use a snowball approach to your research, following leads in available literature to develop your ideas and understanding until you reach a saturation point.

You should demonstrate deep scholarship in your research. Your goal is to be creative and insightful in teasing out new and potentially transformative knowledge from your research through the dissertation, and the map you develop in this first sub task should guide each subsequent subtask in achieving this.

The dissertation chapter should result in you significantly extending the boundaries of what is known in three interconnected areas.Your research methods should be grounded in a deep dive into all relevant academic and scholarly literature, again using a snowball approach until saturation is reached; using your brilliant scholarship and intellect to draw out new knowledge and insights from connections and patterns within and across the literature; and using your intellect and deep scholarship to synthesize these into clear, original and impactful knowledge outputs.

You should ground your approach in philosophy but not be bound by this – taking an approach that transcends disciplinary boundaries to generate new knowledge and insights.

====================

SUB TASK 2

===================

Chapter 1: Introduction – Framing the Polycrisis:

In this sub task you will be researching and writing chapter 1. Please make sure you refer to the supporting documents so that the chapter fits in with the overall dissertation.

This chapter will introduce the research problem and questions, define “polycrisis” in context, and explain its significance. It will outline the interdisciplinary approach and provide a roadmap of the dissertation. (Key themes: why the polycrisis concept, urgency for humanity, scope of analysis.)

Your research should be deep and comprehensive. It should draw extensively on academic and scholarly papers, books and other publications.

You should use a snowball approach in your research where you follow new leads until you reach saturation.

The chapter should be between 10,000 and 20,000 words long

When your research is complete I would like you to deliver the following:

1. 2. A complete and comprehensive draft of chapter 1

A full, complete and comprehensive list of all relevant academic and scholarly

papers, books and other publicationsBefore you return the completed draft I would like you to examine it and edit in the

following two ways:

1. 2. Replace all in-text web links with citations in author-date format

Make sure each in text citation has a corresponding the references in the reference

section

Use Harvard style formatting.

====================

DISSERTATION GUIDING QUESTIONS

===================

As a reminder, the overarching question of the dissertation is:

Can humanity survive the emerging polycrisis of environmental stressors, sociopolitical

upheaval, and technological acceleration?

This encompasses three sub-questions:

1. 2. 3. Is there evidence that humanity is entering a period of polycrisis that is unlike any

previous point in history? What are the dimensions of the emerging polycrisis, how

do they individually and synergistically potentially impact society, where are the

commonalities and points of departure from previous points in history, and what

can be learned from the past?

How might human survival be understood in the context of this research? What are

emergent concepts and ideas around human survival and flourishing, and how are

they informed by history? What can be learned from thinking at the edge of the

distribution rather than in the mainstream.

How can humanity at a global scale begin to think about approaches to surviving

the emerging polycrisis? What are the philosophical, social, political and economic

frames and factors that are likely to inform thinking and actions?

The dissertation should be grounded in scholarship and philosophical thought. Your

research method should draw on a wide range of sources and thought that span human

history — up to the present — to generate new ideas, understanding, and insights.

Questions from Deep Research after the prompt above and before research and

writing began:Deep Research:

Before I begin drafting Chapter 1 of your dissertation, I’d like to clarify a few points to

ensure alignment with your vision:

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Scope and Emphasis: Beyond defining the polycrisis and its significance, are there

specific angles or arguments you want emphasized in the introduction (e.g.,

historical comparison, urgency, philosophical framing)?

Interdisciplinary Lens: Your dissertation takes a transdisciplinary approach.

Should this introduction provide an overview of the key disciplines integrated

(complexity science, resilience theory, political economy, etc.), or would you prefer

to introduce them more deeply in later chapters?

Narrative and Structure: Do you have a preferred structure for Chapter 1? For

example:

o Background & Problem Statement

o Defining the Polycrisis

o Justification of Research Questions

o Interdisciplinary Approach

o Dissertation Roadmap

Theoretical Grounding: Should this chapter engage with the conceptual debates

on polycrisis (e.g., Tooze, Morin, critiques of the term), or save those discussions for

the literature review?

Target Word Count: You mentioned 10,000 to 20,000 words—do you prefer a more

comprehensive or concise introduction?

Let me know your preferences so I can tailor the research and writing accordingly!

Me:

1. 2. 3. 4. You should take a transdisciplinary approach but emphasize philosophical

framings and historical comparisons

do not provide an overview of disciplines, but do lean into the transdisciplinary

approach

This structure looks good. Focus on elegant and persuasive prose.

I think you can bring in conceptual debates in the framing, but remember that this

chapter is also setting up the following dissertation 5. Lean toward 10,000 words